<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>whattheFAQ.com &#187; court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://whatthefaq.com/tag/court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://whatthefaq.com</link>
	<description>Technology, Gadgets, Gaming, News, Pop Culture, Social Commentary. Now with 0 zero trans-fats! What the faq?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 21:43:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>End of The Road for Madonna&#8217;s PR Stunt</title>
		<link>http://whatthefaq.com/2009/05/04/end-of-the-road-for-madonnas-pr-stung/</link>
		<comments>http://whatthefaq.com/2009/05/04/end-of-the-road-for-madonnas-pr-stung/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 20:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bullshit Detective</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adoption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[britney spears]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denied]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Madonna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malawi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatthefaq.com/?p=479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court of Appeal in Malawi has put, what is hopefully, the final nail into the coffin of  Madonna&#8217;s distasteful PR campaign of adopting African children.
As I mentioned in a previous post, I think adoption is a great and completely under-rated tool when it comes to increasing one&#8217;s family. I also don&#8217;t personally have anything against Madonna, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-575" title="madonna" src="http://whatthefaq.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/madonna.jpg" alt="madonna" width="404" height="272" />The Supreme Court of Appeal in Malawi has put, what is hopefully, the final nail into the coffin of  Madonna&#8217;s distasteful PR campaign of adopting African children.</p>
<p>As I mentioned in a previous post, I think adoption is a great and completely under-rated tool when it comes to increasing one&#8217;s family. I also don&#8217;t personally have anything against Madonna, or at least I didn&#8217;t until now. I have a problem with ignoring the needs of children inNorth America who live in poverty, misery, abuse, and malnutrition because it doesn&#8217;t have the same PR potential. One plane trip to Africa with her entourage would probably feed a hungry North American child for life. It could probably also put an underpriviledged young adult through college.</p>
<p>Over the last few decades as the problems in Africa have become better publicized due to concerts, charity work, and Hollywood, anything to do with that country gives you instant street cred as a humanitarian. Madonna has always been a supremely intelligent opportunist, and her tongue-swapper on stage with Britney Spears, during Brit&#8217;s breif period of mental illness, is proof of this fact. Yet no one called on her for exploiting Britney Spears&#8217; clearly vulnerable mental state for the sake of publicity and a great photo op. If it was a male performer in his 50s open mouth kissing a 20 year old on national television, the headlines would have been pretty base and predictably exploitative.</p>
<p>Justice was done here, and I really trully do hope that this child has  a good life without her.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nationalpost.com/arts/story.html?id=1562000">http://www.nationalpost.com/arts/story.html?id=1562000</a></p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwhatthefaq.com%2F2009%2F05%2F04%2Fend-of-the-road-for-madonnas-pr-stung%2F&amp;linkname=End%20of%20The%20Road%20for%20Madonna%26%238217%3Bs%20PR%20Stunt"></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://whatthefaq.com/2009/05/04/end-of-the-road-for-madonnas-pr-stung/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pirate Bay Quartet May Head To Prison</title>
		<link>http://whatthefaq.com/2009/04/17/pirate-bay-quartet-may-head-to-prison/</link>
		<comments>http://whatthefaq.com/2009/04/17/pirate-bay-quartet-may-head-to-prison/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 18:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bullshit Detective</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pop Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4.5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pirate Bay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sentence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sweden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Pirate Bay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatthefaq.com/?p=330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a surprising judgement handed down in Sweden, the 4 members of &#8220;The Pirate Bay&#8221; have been fined 4.5m and have been given 1 year prison sentences. In their usual nonchalant style, they insist that they will fight on, and that they have no intention of, and are not able to, paying the judgement levied against them.
For someone [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a surprising judgement handed down in Sweden, the 4 members of &#8220;The Pirate Bay&#8221; have been fined 4.5m and have been given 1 year prison sentences. In their usual nonchalant style, they insist that they will fight on, and that they have no intention of, and are not able to, paying the judgement levied against them.</p>
<p>For someone following this story from the get-go, and considering that half of prosecution arguments were thrown out within the first few days of the lawsuit, this judgement is surprising and strange. Strange because the site itself, does not and never has contained any actually copyrighted material, just links/addresses of people who share the content. What the article does not say, if the courts will now force The Pirate Bay to hand over their logs, if they do indeed keep any.</p>
<p>It is a somewhat chilling reminder that no matter how free you think you are to post something, whether it&#8217;s a link to a file or an inflammatory comment, someone is responsible for reading it, judging if it violates some sort of law, and then deciding if it gets posted. No public forum, no web site is safe. You would think that of all places Sweden&#8217;s perpetually neutral stand, would have pre-empted the immense lobbying pressure that the media giants usually manage to unleash on the more succeptible media whorish governments, like the US, Brittain, Canada.</p>
<p>To inject some context for non-technical people the following examples are provided:</p>
<p>1) It&#8217;s like charging the Telephone company, if someone posts copyrighted or hatred-inciting material on a telephone pole.</p>
<p>2) It&#8217;s like charging a city if someone draws something lewd or offensive on the sidewalk with chalk.</p>
<p>3) It&#8217;s like laying charges against a grocery store owner, if someone uses the bulletin board to post offensive material.</p>
<p>In a press conferrence, one of theirs said, &#8220;We can&#8217;t pay and we wouldn&#8217;t pay. Even if I had the money I would rather burn everything I owned, and I wouldn&#8217;t even give them the ashes.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8003799.stm">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8003799.stm</a></p>
<p>An ironic twist is that the server pictured, which was The Pirate Bay&#8217;s first actual server, is now in the Stockholm Museum. I wonder if the museum can be charged with copyright infringement because the server may still contain traces of links that at some point may have linked to pirated content.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone" src="http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/45673000/jpg/_45673843_piratebayserver.jpg" alt="" width="226" height="170" /></p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwhatthefaq.com%2F2009%2F04%2F17%2Fpirate-bay-quartet-may-head-to-prison%2F&amp;linkname=Pirate%20Bay%20Quartet%20May%20Head%20To%20Prison"></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://whatthefaq.com/2009/04/17/pirate-bay-quartet-may-head-to-prison/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UPDATE: Madonna To Do Without New Accessory</title>
		<link>http://whatthefaq.com/2009/04/03/update-madonna-to-do-without-new-accessory/</link>
		<comments>http://whatthefaq.com/2009/04/03/update-madonna-to-do-without-new-accessory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 23:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bullshit Detective</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adoption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Madonna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malawi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rejected]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatthefaq.com/?p=237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A court in Malawi has disallowed the adoption of a local child by Madonna. Ruling that since Madonna has not lived in the country in the last 18 months, as required, she is not allowed by law to adopt the child. These measures were put in place to prevent, ahem, human/child trafficking. Strangely, this same [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A court in Malawi has disallowed the adoption of a local child by Madonna. Ruling that since Madonna has not lived in the country in the last 18 months, as required, she is not allowed by law to adopt the child. These measures were put in place to prevent, ahem, human/child trafficking. Strangely, this same law was overlooked during the previous adoption by Modonna of another child, but we won&#8217;t go there. To prove how tasteless (desperate) stars can be when it comes to getting media attention, she will probably appeal or just go to another third world country and attempt to buy another kid.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong I think adoption is great, provided it&#8217;s for the right reason. Press coverage just does not fall into that category. What is the message Angelina Jolie and Madonna are sending to American kids? You can&#8217;t provide as much press coverage, therefore, I don&#8217;t want you? If this was a really trully alltruistic gesture, it would have been done quietly whether locally or abroad.</p>
<p>On the bright side, this guy below would be happy to be adopted by Madonna. I&#8221;m sure he&#8217;s even willing to suck on a bottle and be burped for a roof over his head that isn&#8217;t made of tin and twigs (and the whole eating thing is good too, they don&#8217;t get that regularly in Africa). Tacky and low-class Modonna, get a new PR person.</p>
<p><img src="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2009/04/03/world/africa/03lede_mad.1.480.jpg" alt="INSERT DESCRIPTION" /></p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwhatthefaq.com%2F2009%2F04%2F03%2Fupdate-madonna-to-do-without-new-accessory%2F&amp;linkname=UPDATE%3A%20Madonna%20To%20Do%20Without%20New%20Accessory"></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://whatthefaq.com/2009/04/03/update-madonna-to-do-without-new-accessory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
